fbpx
Plastic Soup Foundation
  • The issue
      • Plastic Soup
      • What is plastic?
      • Plastic in the environment
      • Harm to animals
      • Health effects
      • Regulations
      • Bogus solutions
      • Responsibilities
      • Sustainable development
      • Facts & Figures
  • What we do
      • Health
      • Microplastics
      • Education
      • Plastic Waste
      • Other Projects
  • What you can do
      • As a consumer
      • As an organization
      • As a school
  • Solutions
  • News
  • Donate
  • NL
  • EN
  • Search
  • Menu
You are here: News Prohibit plastics? Use the term ‘essential use’!

Prohibit plastics? Use the term ‘essential use’!

Amsterdam, 04 November 2019 – How do you distinguish between useful and harmful plastics? Scientists refer to the concept of ‘essential use’, which is used in the Montreal Protocol. They applied it to PFAS, a group of substances classified as very worrying. The same principle can also be useful to approach plastics.

The Montreal Protocol and essential use

One of the most successful international environmental agreements ever is the 1987 Montreal Protocol. This agreement provides for the cessation of the use of hydrofluorocarbons suspected of affecting the ozone layer. However, some hydrofluorocarbons are considered ‘essential’ for our health, safety or for the better functioning of our society. They will not be banned unless there is a safe alternative. Therefore, the Montreal Protocol’s assessment yardstick consists of three categories: substances can be non-essential, substitutable or essential. See the recent article advocating this approach for PFAS.

Essential use and microplastics in personal care products

When we apply this measure to microplastics in care products, we immediately see that this use is not essential. The microplastics do not contribute to better health, more safety or a better functioning of society. Alternatives are also available. But manufacturers still use them for marketing or financial reasons, because microplastics are cheap. Since the microplastics used in care products are harmful to the environment, they should be internationally qualified as non-essential and then banned worldwide.

Essential use and medical applications

But how do you judge a plastic prosthesis? Nobody would want to ban it. The same assessment framework can explain such plastics as ‘essential’. This is the case when a certain application contributes to our health and safety and no alternative materials are available yet.

Of course, this assessment framework offers scope for discussion. After all, who decides, for example, how the criterion ‘better for society’ is to be fulfilled? But in the end, this discussion does provide the answers we are looking for and the instruments to effectively combat plastic pollution.

Read more – ECHA proposes to ban intentionally added microplastics

Search

Categories

  • News (547)
  • Health Files (36)
  • Plastic soupermarket (3)
  • What is plastic soup? (22)
  • Types of plastic (5)
  • Beat the microbead (30)
  • Don't use balloons (3)
  • Animal cruelty (15)
  • Microbeads (32)
  • Ocean Clean Wash (23)
  • Plastic Urban Mining (5)
  • My little plastic footprint (11)
  • Synthetic fibers (19)
  • actions frontpage (1)
  • Pressreleases (3)
  • Junior (1)
  • What can you do? (16)
  • Clean rivers (26)
  • Trash hunters (36)
  • Sustainable horticulture (2)
  • What to do with plastic waste? (18)
  • Press releases (17)
  • Solutions (11)
  • Gezondheidseffecten (35)
  • Job openings (1)
  • sponsoring campaign (1)
  • Sponsor actions (4)
  • About us (1)
  • Blogs (17)
  • Plastic Soup Awards (3)
  • Political plume (3)
  • nurdles (5)

Subscribe to our newsletter

and stay informed about our activities!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Donate now and contribute

I'll donate € 5I'll donate € 10I'll donate € 15Other amount

More news

New Research in the Netherlands: synthetic clothing fibers inhibit the production of lung cells

Nylon and polyester hinder the growth and recovery of our airways, scientists from the University of Groningen (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen), TNO, […]

Read more

Ban the export of plastic waste!

European countries are part of the plastic pollution problem in South East Asian countries because shady dealers are free to do what they like. This was yet again the finding of a recent broadcast by Pointer in cooperation with investigative journalists (in Dutch).

Read more

Supermarkets’ plastic policy needs a complete overhaul

By 2025, Dutch supermarkets promise to use 20% less plastic packaging material than in 2017. According to this promise, by 2021 we would be at around 10%.

Read more

Ten years of Plastic Soup Foundation

Today marks the tenth anniversary of Maria Westerbos’ founding of the Plastic Soup Foundation at her kitchen table. Plastic soup, pollution of the environment by plastic, was hardly known at the time. One of her first goals was that everyone in the Netherlands should know what it was.

Read more

About us

  • Frontrunners
  • Mission & Vision
  • Our People
  • Working with Us
  • Annual Reports
  • Inquiries Press

Our approach

  • Plastic Soup Angels
  • Funds & Partners
  • Ambassadors
  • Plastic Soup Awards
  • Plastic Soup Atlas
  • Facts & Figures
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Instagram

  • LinkedIn

  • YouTube

  • Contact

 
© Copyright - Plastic Soup Foundation
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
Shady destinations of collected plastic waste Blood tests in petrels show unknown effects on plastic pollution
Scroll to top
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more