Plastic Soup Foundation
  • The issue
      • Plastic Soup
      • What is plastic?
      • Plastic in the environment
      • Harm to animals
      • Health effects
      • Regulations
      • Bogus solutions
      • Responsibilities
      • Sustainable development
      • Facts & Figures
  • What we do
      • Health
      • Microplastics
      • Education
      • Plastic Waste
  • How you can help
      • Consumer
      • Business
      • Community
      • Kids
      • At school
  • Solutions
  • News
  • Donate
  • NL
  • EN
  • Search
  • Menu Menu
You are here: News State Secretary Van Veldhoven Claims that Shell’s New Mega Plastic Factory Is “Not Her Responsibility”

State Secretary Van Veldhoven Claims that Shell’s New Mega Plastic Factory Is “Not Her Responsibility”

3 June 2020

State Secretary Stientje van Veldhoven (D66) is trying to persuade companies to use less virgin (new) plastic and more recycled material, for example by inviting them to join the Plastic Pact. The reality is that the use of plastic continues to increase, and the recycling industry is having difficulty finding a market for their recyclate as virgin plastic can be bought at dump prices. 

Shell – who has not sign the Plastic Pact – is investing billions of dollars in the US in a new plastics factor in Pennsylvania. Parliamentary questions have been asked and answered regarding this development.

Not her responsibility

Members of parliament asked the State Secretary whether the desired re-use of plastic can be realised when new plastic is so cheap. And whether she would be so good as to point out to Shell the negative results of their investment decision. In her answer, Van Veldhoven commented in April of this year that Shell’s investment decisions were not her responsibility. She said that she did not have insight ‘into the motives of oil companies to build plastics factories.’ Other answers were similarly evasive. Van Veldhoven could not confirm that the re-use of plastic is thwarted because virgin plastic is much too cheap.

Van Veldhoven obviously knows very well what is going on. It’s explained in great detail in the memorandum that NRK Recycling drew up at her request and sent to her in January. This analysis concerns the competitive disadvantage of recyclate when compared to plastics based on oil or gas.  The drafters of the memorandum warn that the ambition to achieve a circular plastics economy will only be reached if the government is willing to intervene.

Misleading

In answer to the question whether or not the Shell factory undermined her efforts to achieve an International Plastic Pact, the State Secretary stated that the two were not necessarily in conflict with each other. “Shell can partly meet the growing worldwide demand for plastic by using plastic waste as raw material for their plastics production factories (also known as ‘feedstock recycling’). I understand from the media that Shell has plans in this direction. More recycling is in line with the objectives of our national Plastic Pact and also the recently concluded European Plastic Pact.”

MP’s are being misled here. The Pennsylvania plastics factory will use only ethane, a shale gas by-product, as its feedstock. Ethane is used to produce polyethylene (PE), which in turn is used to produce plastic packaging, among other things. Moreover, there is absolutely no question of feedstock recycling that can meet ‘part of the demand’ for plastic, as the State Secretary would have us believe. It’s true that Shell has a pilot project elsewhere in the United Stated to make oil from plastic waste via pyrolysis , but that is not relevant to the point in question. 

In answer to the question whether she was willing to make it clear to Shell that the building of a new plastics factory was very undesirable, van Veldhoven answered that she would happily engage with Shell to discuss “the contribution the company can make to the circular economy.”

It’s all just word games…….

IRRESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS

A group of concerned scientists and experts sent an open letter last March in which they expressed their grave concern about the investment of billions by Shell in new plastic. “We call on Shell and the banks, insurance companies and pension funds who invest in Shell to call a halt to their irresponsible investments in plastic, and we urge Shell to sign up to the European Plastic Pact.” The letter points out the responsibility incumbent on the Dutch government. Policy needs to be drafted to prevent investment in new plastic, even if that investment is outside the national borders.

Even more plastic soup

Shell is one of the multinationals who founded the Alliance to End Plastic Waste (AEPW), a partnership that has about $1.5 billion available to combat plastic pollution. The Guardian calculated that this amount pales into insignificance when compared to the investments made in plastic by multinationals like Shell. Shell declines to comment regarding the level of investment in the controversial Pennsylvania factory, estimates suggest that this is between six and ten billion dollars.

It seems very much as if the pyrolysis project and participation in the AEPW are meant to divert the attention from Shell’s investments in plastic, investments which will only serve to deepen the problem of plastic soup.

You might also like

  • Open letter: look further than the European Plastic Pact and tackle the producers. Starting with Shell
  • New initiative from industry: Alliance to End Plastic Waste
  • Prospects for a circular plastics economy are worse than ever
  • Dutch banks and insurance companies invest billions in shale gas and plastic production
  • Does the Rutte cabinet really want less plastic?

Search

Categories

  • News (533)
  • What can you do? (13)
  • Health Files (38)
  • Clean rivers (24)
  • Plastic soupermarket (2)
  • Trash hunters (49)
  • What is plastic soup? (12)
  • What to do with plastic waste? (12)
  • Types of plastic (3)
  • Press releases (16)
  • Beat the microbead (16)
  • Solutions (11)
  • Don't use balloons (3)
  • Gezondheidseffecten (56)
  • Animal cruelty (13)
  • sponsoring campaign (1)
  • Microbeads (27)
  • Sponsor actions (3)
  • Ocean Clean Wash (12)
  • About us (1)
  • Plastic Urban Mining (4)
  • Blogs (16)
  • My little plastic footprint (5)
  • Plastic Soup Awards (3)
  • Synthetic fibers (19)
  • Political plume (3)
  • actions frontpage (1)
  • nurdles (5)
  • Pressreleases (2)
  • Microplastics in cosmetics (1)
  • Junior (1)
  • No category (1)

Subscribe to our newsletter

and stay informed about our activities!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Donate now and contribute

I'll donate € 5I'll donate € 10I'll donate € 15Other amount

More news

It is estimated that 171 trillion microplastic particles float in the ocean

A new study estimates that 171 trillion microplastics float on the surface of the ocean. Urgent action is required.

Read more

Plastic rocks on an isolated island

The sombre message of stones made of plastic found on an uninhabited island far from the Brazilian coast.

Read more

EU ban on microplastics in cosmetics: too slow and too limited

Cosmetics companies selling personal care products without microplastics are calling for the swift introduction of a total ban in an open letter.

Read more

Sungai Watch prevents Bali’s plastic waste from reaching the ocean

In Bali, more and more rivers are being cleaned from plastic waste every day. What do Dutch travel suitcases made from recycled ocean plastic have to do with that?

Read more

About us

  • Frontrunners
  • Mission & Vision
  • Our People
  • Working with Us
  • Annual Reports
  • Inquiries Press
  • Newsletter

Our approach

  • Plastic Soup Angels
  • Funds & Partners
  • Ambassadors
  • Plastic Soup Awards
  • Plastic Soup Atlas
  • Facts & Figures
DONATE
  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Instagram

  • LinkedIn

  • YouTube

  • Contact

 

© Copyright - Plastic Soup Foundation
  • Contact
  • Privacy policy
  • GDPR Consent Settings
Synthetic microfibers and susceptibility to COVID-19Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are no longer against a tax on virgin plastic
Scroll to top

GDPR settings

This website uses some cookies which are placed on your device. Your web browser stores these cookies when you visit our Website: www.plasticsoupfoundation.org. These cookies will be retrieved when you visit or use our Website again. This allows us to recognise you as a previous visitor/user.

x
Settings

Your privacy and this website...

This website uses some cookies which are placed on your device. Your web browser stores these cookies when you visit our Website: www.plasticsoupfoundation.org. These cookies will be retrieved when you visit or use our Website again. This allows us to recognise you as a previous visitor/user.

Functional technology enables a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in. No personalised information is collected.

See details

This consent is used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.

See details

This consent helps website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting.

See details
Forget my settings Settings have been forgotten